Trump wants to delay the NYC Stormy Daniels trial


Donald Trump is trying to push back his upcoming trial in the Stormy Daniels hush money case in an eleventh-hour delay bid, arguing that it shouldn’t go forward until the Supreme Court rules on his presidential immunity claim.
In Manhattan Supreme Court filings, Trump’s lawyers said evidence prosecutors intend to present at the criminal trial — set to be Trump’s first of four and potentially the only one he attends before the election — is related to his outstanding immunity claim before the nation’s high court.
Specifically, they cited public statements Trump made as president and posts to his official presidential account on X, in addition to related witness testimony.
It’s unclear how long the justices will wait to rule on whether Trump is above the law after hearing arguments, but it could be as late as June.
Trump has sought to invoke the presidential immunity defense in all his criminal matters.
“Trump has not explained how hiring and making payments to a personal attorney to handle personal affairs carries out a constitutional duty.
Reimbursing Cohen for advancing hush money to Stephanie Clifford cannot be considered the performance of a constitutional duty,” Hellerstein wrote.
“Falsifying business records to hide such reimbursement, and to transform the reimbursement into a business expense for Trump and income to Cohen, likewise does not relate to a presidential duty.”Bragg’s office declined to comment.
Prosecutors are expected to respond in court filings by Wednesday, and Judge Juan Merchan is slated to rule on several pretrial motions from both sides on Thursday.
Last week, Merchan ruled that the jury would be anonymous to the public and that their addresses would only be disclosed to lawyers.

In an effort to delay the trial by the last minute, Donald Trump is attempting to move it forward until the Supreme Court makes a decision regarding his claim of presidential immunity in the Stormy Daniels hush money case.

Trump’s attorneys filed filings with the Manhattan Supreme Court claiming that the prosecution plans to use evidence pertaining to his unresolved immunity claim before the country’s highest court in the criminal trial, which is scheduled to be the first of four and possibly the only one he attends before the election. In particular, they referenced related witness testimony as well as public remarks made by Trump while in office and postings to his official presidential account on X.

Trump’s attorneys, Susan Necheles and Todd Blanche, stated in the March 7 documents made public on Monday that the evidence “implicites presidential immunity because President Trump was President of the United States at the time of those actions in 2018.”. “.

“The president’s political opponents will attempt to influence and control his or her decisions via de facto extortion or blackmail with the threat, explicit or implicit, of indictment by a future, hostile administration, for acts that do not warrant any such prosecution,” Necheles and Blanche wrote, if the president is not shielded from criminal prosecution based on official acts.

“This threat will hang like a millstone around the neck of every future president, clouding the president’s ability to deal fearlessly and impartially with the duties of his office, distorting presidential decision-making and undermining the president’s independence.”. “.

On April 25, the Supreme Court will consider arguments before determining whether or not special prosecutor Jack Smith’s federal election subversion case exempts Trump’s presidential actions from criminal prosecution.

After hearing arguments, the justices may decide to rule as late as June. It is unclear how long they will delay to make that decision.

In the case filed by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, the front-runner for the Republican Party has entered a not guilty plea to 34 felonies. The prosecution claims that the candidate covered up payment to his former attorney Michael Cohen for a hush money payment made to Daniels in 2017 in order to conceal an unlawful “catch and kill” plot that was carried out to ensure his victory for president the previous year.

In all of his criminal cases, Trump has attempted to use the presidential immunity defense. He tried to have Bragg’s case transferred to federal court last year, but was unsuccessful. He claimed that the actions were taken in the course of his official presidential duties, that they “w[e] taken solely because he was president of the United States,” and that his choice to hire Cohen as his personal attorney “arose out of his duties as president.”. “.

You. S. Events that transpired during Trump’s presidency did not inherently fall within the purview of his responsibilities, District Court Judge Alvin Hellerstein concluded in July, rejecting those arguments.

“Trump has not provided an explanation for how fulfilling a constitutional obligation entails hiring and paying a personal attorney to handle personal matters. Hellerstein argued that paying Cohen back for giving Stephanie Clifford hush money could not be regarded as fulfilling a constitutional obligation.

Similarly, fabricating business records to conceal such reimbursement and turn it into revenue for Cohen and a business expense for Trump has nothing to do with the president’s duties. “.

The Bragg administration declined to provide a statement. Judge Juan Merchan is scheduled to make decisions on a number of pretrial motions from both sides on Thursday. Prosecutors are expected to reply in court documents by Wednesday.

The judge has not yet ruled on Bragg’s request for a limited gag order, which would forbid Trump from making public comments about any of the case’s witnesses, prosecutors (excluding Bragg), Merchan and the DA’s staff, their families, and potential jurors.

The jury will remain anonymous to the general public, and their addresses will only be shared with attorneys, according to a decision made by Merchan last week.

Leave a Reply

scroll to top