The man was found guilty in the West Chester quadruple homicide trial

The Cincinnati Enquirer

Four people were killed at the Lakefront apartment complex on April 28, 2019: Shalinderjit Kaur, 39, Singh’s wife.
Prosecutors said Singh’s relationship with his father-in-law had grown tense amid Singh’s declining finances and repeated demands for money.
Singh’s attorneys said he witnessed his family’s deaths at the hands of an unknown shooter.
“They’re asking you to convict him because someone didn’t prove who else did it,” Alex Deardorff, one of Singh’s attorneys, told the judges.
Singh’s attorneys said the dispute over Pannag’s land put his business partners, one of whom faced criminal extradition to the U.S., at risk of losing over $1 million worth of investments.
Singh’s attorneys say one of those men had connections in Butler County.
However, Deardorff said the evidence doesn’t single out Singh as the shooter and that he is on trial for one simple reason: he lied.
Shortly after the shooting, investigators found the murder weapon – a 9mm handgun – submerged in a pond behind Singh’s apartment.

NEUTRAL

Only one person survived after five people broke into an apartment on Wyndtree Drive in April 2019.

The lone survivor, Gurpreet Singh, was found guilty on all four counts of aggravated murder on Friday. Prosecutors used this description to explain the killing of a Sikh family in West Chester Township. The death penalty is now an option for him.

In Butler County Common Pleas Court, a three-judge panel found 41-year-old Singh guilty of his second capital murder trial following the hearing of closing arguments on Friday morning. Merely after 11:30 a.m., the judges adjourned. me. to consider the matter and render a decision more than two hours later.

The accusation against Singh was that he killed his wife, her parents, and her Indian-born aunt. When the jury failed to reach a unanimous decision during his prior trial in late 2022, a mistrial was proclaimed.

On April 28, 2019, there were four fatalities at the Lakefront apartment building:.

Singh’s wife, Shalinderjit Kaur, is 39.

Singh’s mother-in-law is Parmjit Kaur, 62.

Singh’s wife’s aunt is Amarjit Kaur, 58 years old.

The father-in-law of Singh is 59-year-old Hakiakat Singh Pannag.

Family members of the victims, who had been waiting more than five years for justice and closure, were relieved by Friday’s verdict.

After hearing the verdict, Amarjit Kaur’s son Garry Hans remarked, “I feel like my mom she was standing next to me saying, ‘Thank you.”. For them, it makes a nice Mother’s Day present. ****.

As Judge Gregory Howard announced the panel’s decision, Singh remained still in between his lawyers. Monday morning is his scheduled appearance in court for the initiation of the sentencing phase of the trial.

Prosecutors: The family had to have trusted the murderer.

According to Hamilton County Chief Deputy Coroner Dr. Karen Looman, all of the victims sustained multiple gunshot wounds to the head, for a total of 16 gunshot wounds. No one suffered any defensive wounds.

Singh was the only person with the motivation and chance to carry out the killings covertly, according to the prosecution, who presented evidence during the trial of family dynamics damaged by financial difficulties and a costly affair.

Josh Muennich, an assistant prosecutor for Butler County, stated, “They were alive until the defendant came home.”.

Over the course of eight days, the prosecution called 34 witnesses, including Singh’s former mistress, who attested to the fact that Singh gave her $20,000 for the down payment on an Indianapolis home, assisted with her mortgage, and even purchased her a car.

According to testimony, Singh also purchased a home on the same street as his mistress, where he intended to relocate his family. Weeks after the killings, he went there with family.

Prosecutors claimed that because of Singh’s deteriorating financial situation and persistent demands for money, his relationship with his father-in-law had become strained.

According to Muennich, “He could not afford the lifestyle he was leading.”.

Amrik Tiwana, a close friend and Sikh community member of Pannag’s, testified regarding an early 2019 meeting where Pannag expressed fear and displayed bruises he believed Singh had inflicted.

Singh saw his family members killed by an unidentified gunman, according to his lawyers. They also mentioned another potential reason for the killings: a legal battle that is still going on in India regarding the sale of land. Singh refrained from testifying in support of himself.

One of Singh’s attorneys, Alex Deardorff, told the judges, “They’re asking you to convict him because someone didn’t prove who else did it.”. Gurpreet did not murder his relatives. “.

According to Singh’s attorneys, Pannag’s land dispute put his business partners in jeopardy, with one of them facing criminal extradition to the U.S. s. , with investments worth more than $1 million at risk.

This is corroborated by Parmjit Kaur’s affidavit, in which she requests the revocation of her nephew’s power of attorney status due to threats he has received and his desire to no longer represent the family. Additionally, her itinerary showed that she would be departing for India in just two days following the shooting.

Both of Pannag’s previous business partners were found to be outside of the United States by investigators. s. as per Detective Jason Flick, at the time of the murders. One of those men, according to Singh’s lawyers, had ties to Butler County.

The front door’s moulding, which was hanging from the door by a security chain and separated from the wall, had damage that Deardorff saw as proof that someone had broken in.

The prosecution claimed that there was no proof the door was harmed from the outside and that Parmjit Kaur had probably torn the moulding off the wall in an attempt to flee.

Prosecutors said that Singh fired the fatal shots while standing over his unconscious wife, Pannag was shot first while lying in bed, then his daughter, wife, and sister-in-law.

Singh canceled his work and made sure his three children were with family when he killed them, according to the prosecution, demonstrating his deliberate planning. They said the murderer had to be someone the family trusted.

But according to Deardorff, Singh is only on trial because of one small lie—the evidence does not specifically name him as the shooter.

Prosecutors point to evidence that shows Singh entered the apartment nearly half an hour before calling 911 to report the shooting. Singh lied to police about his affair and about being at home during the incident.

He never mentioned that he was home when his family was killed, only telling detectives in a taped interview that he had just returned home to find the apartment door open and his family bleeding on the floor.

According to Muennich, “the defendant lied to protect himself.”.

When Singh was asked to provide a gunshot residue swab, he became agitated and attempted to flee, despite his initial cooperation with the investigators’ efforts to create a timeline, as seen in the footage.

Following the acquisition of a search warrant, Singh’s hands were eventually swabbed by police, who discovered gunshot residue. However, trial testimony suggests that Singh may not have fired a weapon.

Investigators discovered the murder weapon, a 9mm handgun, submerged in a pond behind Singh’s apartment shortly after the shooting. Detectives couldn’t determine when or by whom the gun was last bought because the serial number had been forced off.

According to Jon Marshall, another prosecutor involved in the case, “this was a pre-planned, carefully calculated and designed assassination of four human beings.”.

scroll to top