On Day 8 of the Donald Trump trial, there were some things said

Precise News

Jurors will now have a three-day weekend to think about what they heard during the first full week of testimony in the historic Donald Trump hush money trial.
On Friday afternoon, prosecutors called Rhona Graff, who was Trump’s assistant at the Trump Organization, where she worked for more than 30 years.
But Trump is charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records – so prosecutors have warned this will in many ways be a routine, document-heavy trial.
In that interview, Pecker testified that Trump had in fact thanked him during that 2017 Trump Tower meeting.
The point was a small one in the grand scheme of Pecker’s testimony related to the case, but the fight was really about Pecker’s credibility as a witness.
Graff managed Trump’s contacts and calendar for much of her 34 years as his assistant at Trump Tower.
He replied, “Of course I do.” Graff no longer works for Trump, but she spoke positively about her experience at the Trump Organization and having Trump as a boss.
Some, like Graff and Pecker, still have plenty of good things to say about Trump.


After hearing testimony for the first full week of the historic Donald Trump hush money trial, jurors will have a three-day weekend to reflect on their findings.

Following four days of testimony totaling more than ten hours, David Pecker eventually left the witness stand. The former American Media Inc. chief went into great depth about how, during the 2016 campaign, he assisted Donald Trump in stifling unfavorable reports and harassing Trump’s opponents in the National Enquirer.

The arguments between Pecker’s account and those of Stormy Daniels, an adult film star, and Michael Cohen, Trump’s former fixer and attorney, during their testimony prepared the ground for more fights.

Prosecutors called Rhona Graff, who spent more than 30 years working as Trump’s assistant at the Trump Organization, on Friday afternoon.

She left the witness stand very quickly, and Cohen’s banker then spoke, indicating that the trial would soon turn to the documents that form the basis of the accusations against Trump.

The main lessons from Friday are as follows:.

Trial observes a paper trail.

With a tabloid publisher stifling turbulent affairs for a businessman-turned-politician and a hush money scheme run by a now-disbarred lawyer for a porn star, the hush money case against Trump tells a colorful story.

Yet, prosecutors have cautioned that since Trump is accused of 34 counts of falsifying business records, this will essentially be a standard trial with a lot of paperwork.

A First Republic Bank banker was the third witness called by the prosecution on Friday afternoon.

The jurors were shown the documentation pertaining to a Delaware shell company and bank account that Michael Cohen established with the intention of paying AMI for the rights to Karen McDougal’s story—a transaction that never took place. In the end, the banker’s testimony indicated that the account was never funded.

Banker Gary Farro provided testimony based on documents indicating that Cohen veered off course approximately two weeks later in October 2016 and opened an account for Essential Consultants, a different business that was eventually used to pay Daniels in the hush money scam to bury her report about an alleged affair with Trump. Both of the claimed affairs have been refuted by Trump. ).

Monday is a dark day for court. When the trial reconvenes on Tuesday of next week, Farro is anticipated to continue testifying. He is anticipated to take the jury through the documentation pertaining to a home equity line of credit that Cohen obtained on his own property in order to pay Daniels.

Attorney for Trump makes an effort to undermine Pecker’s authority.

Throughout his four days of testimony, Pecker presented the jury with two opposing accounts: Prosecutors pressed the AMI chief to testify that Pecker’s 2015 arrangement with Trump was special, enabling him to serve as the campaign’s “eyes and ears” and purchasing uncharacteristically large amounts of negative news about the president.

During Pecker’s last day on the witness stand, Trump’s lawyers attempted to undermine his evidence by bringing up a number of purported inconsistencies, highlighting differences from earlier interviews with federal and state prosecutors and challenging his statement that AMI acknowledged breaking campaign finance laws.

Pecker’s lawyer for Trump, Emil Bove, questioned him multiple times during the cross-examination about whether or not his testimony was a “mistake.”. “.

On every occasion, Bove attempted to draw attention to discrepancies between Pecker’s testimony to prosecutors earlier in the week and his previous interviews with investigators concerning AMI’s $150,000 payment to McDougal for her claim of an affair with Trump.

Bove once cited FBI notes from a 2018 interview in which agents stated Pecker’s testimony that during a meeting at Trump Tower on January 6, 2017, Trump did not express gratitude to him or AMI. Pecker had stated in court earlier this week that he received a thank you from Trump for handling the stories about the doorman and McDougal during the campaign.

While acknowledging discrepancies between his current testimony and the FBI notes, Pecker refuted the notes.

The goal of the prosecution is to restore Pecker’s credibility.

In response, prosecutors tried to restore Pecker’s credibility by demonstrating that his account was coherent and that AMI had acknowledged engaging in campaign finance violations.

The prosecution referred to an additional FBI interview from 2018, one week after the one that Bove mentioned, during a redirect from assistant district attorney Joshua Steinglass. Pecker stated in the interview that Trump had, in fact, thanked him at the Trump Tower meeting in 2017. According to Pecker, this was in line with his testimony.

Pecker was pressed to clarify that AMI had not admitted to any campaign finance violations after Bove claimed that Pecker’s testimony was inaccurate when he stated that AMI had admitted to such violations. Steinglass, however, retaliated by asking Pecker to attest that AMI did admit in the agreement that “the conduct it had admitted in connection with the Karen McDougal payment” had been illegal as it related to federal elections politics.

The fight was really about Pecker’s credibility as a witness, even though the point was minor in the context of Pecker’s testimony regarding the case.

That is crucial to the prosecution’s case since he supports Cohen’s testimony and helps connect the .s in the bigger hush money scam.

Trump smiles for his devoted assistant.

Less than an hour was spent during the testimony of Trump’s longtime assistant Rhona Graff.

For the majority of her 34 years working as Trump’s assistant at Trump Tower, Graff oversaw his calendar and connections. The Trump Organization’s contact entries were seen by the jury. Daniels and McDougal’s system. She entered them for Trump, according to Graff.

Only a cell phone number was provided for Daniels’ contact, “Stormy,” in the Trump Organization contact file. McDougal provided two addresses, a phone number, and an email address in his contact information.

Graff further stated under direct examination that she had once seen Daniels at Trump Tower. During the cross-examination, Susan Necheles, the attorney for Trump, clarified to Graff that Daniels may have visited Trump’s office to talk about “Celebrity Apprentice.”. “.

Graff remarked, “I kind of remember him saying that she was one of the people that might be an interesting contestant on the show.”.

On Friday, a normally reserved Trump cracked a smile in response to Graff’s testimony about her former boss.

“Throughout all that time, I never experienced the same day twice,” she remarked. The place was incredibly energizing, captivating, and stimulating. “.

Trump’s humanity is attempted by Defense.

Pecker, the former head of AMI, stated on the stand that he had been friends with Trump since the 1980s. Even though it had been a few years since they had spoken, Pecker spoke kindly of Trump earlier in the week, calling him a “mentor” and asserting that he had no animosity toward the man.

Bove questioned Pecker one last time, asking him if he thought Trump had any concern for his family. “Of course I do,” was his response. “.

Graff stated favorably about her time at the Trump Organization and having Trump as her boss, even though she is no longer employed by the president. Graff responded, “I don’t think I would have been there 34 years if he didn’t,” when asked if Trump respected her intelligence. At the remark, Trump grinned and laughed.

Recalling that this case will feature a parade of witnesses from Trump’s pre-election life—including former workers at the Trump Organization and former White House aides like Hope Hicks—was something the prosecution’s first two witnesses reminded Trump of.

Pecker and Graff are two individuals who still have a lot of positive things to say about Trump.

Further witnesses in this case, such as Cohen and Daniels, will have an even more negative opinion of the defendant; Cohen in particular, has been attacking Trump on social media in the weeks preceding and following the trial.

scroll to top