Johnson criticized Biden for weighing executive action on asylum


President Joe Biden on Thursday faced criticism from Republicans and some progressive Democrats over reports that he is considering executive action to tighten asylum restrictions.
The considerations come as Biden continues to face political headwinds on immigration in the 2024 campaign.
House Republicans have pressured him for months to act unilaterally to curb migrant encounters at the southwest border, which reached a record high in December.
When asked about his executive authority last month, Biden told reporters: “I’ve done all I can do.”
Former President Donald Trump, too, has encouraged Republicans to avoid passing a compromise bill and wait until after the 2024 election.
Jim Watson/AFP via Getty ImagesIn taking a tougher stance on the issue, Biden has drawn fire from progressives within his own party.
“Doing Trump impressions isn’t how we beat Trump,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., wrote on X in response to reports he is weighing possible executive action.
Democrat Rep. Pramila Jayapal, chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said an executive action to tighten asylum restrictions “would be an extremely disappointing mistake.”
Executive action restricting asylum could also result in legal battles.
“The Biden administration should ensure that any border security executive action protects due process for asylum seekers and provides resources for a fair, efficient and humane asylum system,”Kerri Talbot, the executive director of the advocacy group Immigration Hub, said in a statement.

Republicans and some progressive Democrats criticized President Joe Biden on Thursday in response to rumors that he is thinking of taking executive action to tighten asylum regulations.

One possible solution, as an administration official told ABC News, would be to forbid immigrants from requesting asylum upon entering the U.S. S. illegally between borders. However, the official emphasized that they have not yet decided what action, if any, to take.

Given the political obstacles Biden is facing regarding immigration in the 2024 campaign, these factors are taken into account. He has been under intense pressure from House Republicans for months to take unilateral action to reduce the number of encounters with migrants at the southwest border, which hit a record high in December.

Previous suggestions that he could do so were dismissed by the White House, which claimed that only legislation passed by Congress could effectively resolve the issue. “I’ve done all I can do,” Biden told reporters last month in response to a question concerning his executive authority. “.

Biden’s possible shift in direction was written off as “election year gimmicks” by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has spearheaded the push for Biden to exercise executive authority while simultaneously keeping a bipartisan immigration plan out of the Senate. “.”.

In an election year, Johnson said, “the president suddenly seems interested in trying to make a change using the legal authority that he claimed until recently didn’t exist.” This comes after the president gave up control of the border to cartels and smugglers, thousands of Americans tragically lost their lives to fentanyl poisoning, countless unaccompanied minors and young people were victims of human trafficking, and millions of illegal aliens were dispersed throughout our nation by the Biden administration.

Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, speaks after National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan briefs the U.S. s. Capitol, February. fifteenth, 2024, in Washington. Credit: Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images.

In response to questions regarding Biden’s earlier remarks that he had run out of options regarding the border, an administration official claimed it would be reckless to ignore other options after the immigration deal reached a standstill in Congress.

The bill included funding to strengthen immigration review and hire more border patrol agents; some changes to the asylum system; and new emergency powers for officials. It tied border security and immigration reforms to aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.

However, Johnson, who insisted that immigration reforms be linked to foreign aid, scuppered the agreement prior to its announcement and declared it “dead on arrival” in the House shortly after. Republicans have been urged by former President Donald Trump to postpone passing a compromise bill until after the 2024 election.

Republicans were criticized by Biden for blowing the agreement and “caving” in to Trump.

Speaking from the White House earlier this month, he declared, “Every day between now and November, the American people are gonna know that the only reason the border is not secure is Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican friends.”.

Yet polls indicate that Biden’s weak point is immigration: a recent ABC News/Ipsos poll found that Biden only has an 18% approval rating on the topic.

In the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, on February 20, President Joe Biden discusses the Senate’s approval of war aid for Ukraine. 13 in 2024. Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images.

Biden has come under fire from progressives inside his own party for adopting a more firm stance on the matter.

“Beating Trump doesn’t require doing Trump impressions,” Rep. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N. Y. responded to rumors that he is considering taking executive action by writing on X. “Everyone has the legal right to apply for asylum. We should remain steadfast in our commitment to our principles in the face of authoritarian threats rather than compromising. “.”.

Representative for Democrats. The head of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, Pramila Jayapal, stated that an executive action to increase restrictions on asylum “would be an extremely disappointing mistake.”. ****.

“We’ve tried cruel enforcement-only policies for 30 years, and they just don’t work,” Jayapal posted on X. Democrats must lead with humanity and dignity; we cannot keep copying Donald Trump and Stephen Miller. “.”.

Legal disputes may also arise from executive action that restricts asylum. The New York Times was informed by an ACLU lawyer that the party may contest the action based on specifics.

There has also been opposition to the idea from immigration activists.

Executive director of the advocacy group Immigration Hub, Kerri Talbot, said in a statement that “the Biden administration should ensure that any border security executive action protects due process for asylum seekers and provides resources for a fair, efficient, and humane asylum system.”.

It would be unlawful and foolish to outlaw asylum. Americans desire a secure border with a system that guards asylum seekers’ rights, according to Talbot.

Armando Garcia of ABC News assisted with this report.

Leave a Reply

scroll to top