A man was able to get $14,000 worth of earrings for under 14 dollars due to a price error

Precise News

Cartier jewelry can typically cost thousands of dollars, but a 27-year-old man spent under $14 on luxury earrings from the French brand after discovering a price error.
“I was amazed to see how much the necklaces cost and so on and I said: ‘Someday,’ until I saw the earrings,” Villarreal wrote on social media.
A week after Villarreal bought the earrings, Cartier tried to cancel his order and say the items were no longer available, he wrote on X.
When Villarreal decided not to cancel the order, the jeweler’s reps began calling him, the X post continued to explain.
Villarreal said the Cartier reps told him the earrings he “ordered were not at the correct price” so they “wanted to cancel the purchase.”
Villarreal said the consumer protection agency summoned Cartier for arbitration and tried to mediate an agreement.
“War is over,” Villarreal said on April 22 in an X post.
Villarreal said in a separate X post on April 26 that he was “excited” to give a set of earrings to his mother.


Cartier jewelry can often cost thousands of dollars, but after spotting a pricing error, a 27-year-old man bought opulent earrings from the French brand for less than $14.

Mexican citizen Rogelio Villarreal revealed on Instagram on April 20 through X that on December, he was using the restroom and falling down a rabbit hole. 12, 2023, when he came across the jeweler’s website featuring the 18-carat rose-gold Clash de Cartier earrings. According to Villarreal, the earrings were priced at 237 Mexican pesos, or $13.91, as opposed to the current retail price of $11,600.

Villarreal posted on social media, saying, “I was shocked to see how much the necklaces cost and so on and I said: ‘Someday,'” until she saw the earrings. “I swear I got a chill. “.

Cartier was contacted by USA TODAY; however, no response was received.

Price tag outrage: After visiting a mall kiosk, a retiree from Texas was hit with $10,000 in cosmetic charges.

According to Cartier, the earrings “were not at the correct price.”.

After purchasing two sets of the earrings, Villarreal discovered, according to another X post, that the price had been changed on Cartier’s website to 237,000 Mexican pesos, or $13,890.93.

According to what Villarreal wrote on X, Cartier attempted to cancel his order and claim that the items were out of stock a week after Villarreal purchased the earrings. Villarreal was called by the jeweler’s representatives after he chose not to cancel the order; the X post went on to elaborate.

The Cartier representatives, according to Villarreal, informed him that the earrings he “ordered were not at the correct price” and that they “wanted to cancel the purchase.”. According to an email Villarreal received and shared on X, Cartier promised to give Villarreal a gift to make up for the “inconvenience.” The gift turned out to be a complimentary bottle of Cartier Cuvée champagne and a leather Cartier item.

A consumer complaint was filed by Rogelio Villarreal.

Villarreal declined Cartier’s gifts and, via a contact form on the business website, referenced a federal consumer protection law in Mexico that says a supplier of goods may be sued “for failing to uphold the terms and conditions under which” a good or service is purchased.

For “conciliation,” disagreements may be brought before the Office of the Federal Prosecutor for the Consumer, according to the terms and conditions for sales on Cartier’s website in Mexico. Villarreal claimed to have noticed this. He subsequently lodged a grievance with the federal consumer protection agency’s Matamoros branch.

According to Villarreal, the consumer protection agency attempted to mediate a settlement by calling Cartier for arbitration. Jorge Lopez Zozaya, a corporate lawyer in Mexico City, told the New York Times that the agency could impose fines or penalties if it found Cartier or any other company at fault. According to Zozaya, the agency is unable to enforce a listed price on businesses.

According to Zozaya, Mexican law does not provide consumers with protections in situations like that, even if a listed price was an obvious error.

According to the attorney, “Cartier would have most likely won this case in a court of law,” the New York Times reported.

“War is over”: Man defeats Cartier in an effective war.

The jeweler sent the Tamaulipas, Mexico native the two sets of earrings he paid about $28 for, so Villarreal and Cartier did not need to go to court or hire attorneys.

On April 22, Villarreal declared in an X post that “war is over.”. “Cartier has arrived. “.”.

On April 26, Villarreal posted on X stating, “Once upon a December.” It seems that the earrings arrived on that date. “.

On April 26, Villarreal stated that he was “excited” to give his mother a pair of earrings in a different X post.

His note said, “Those earrings are for her.”.

In subsequent TikTok videos, Villarreal would showcase the earrings, including one in which she unboxed the pricey pieces. He also told the New York Times that he intended to sign a settlement agreement to terminate his legal dispute with Cartier and end his complaint with the consumer protection agency.

scroll to top