Bipartisan scrutiny has mounted over a report that Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, issued a verbal order in September to strike the vessel.
The House and Senate armed services committees have opened investigations into the recent US military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week’s Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were sceptical.
Still, they said the reported attacking of survivors of an initial missile strike posed serious concerns and merited further scrutiny.
The Republican senator for Mississippi, Roger Wicker, the chair of the Senate armed services committee, pledged that his panel’s investigation would be “done by the numbers”.
A US navy admiral will provide a classified briefing to lawmakers overseeing the military on Thursday as they investigate a US attack on a boat in the Caribbean Sea allegedly carrying drugs that included a second strike that killed any survivors.
The White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, on Monday said the second strike was carried out “in self-defence” and in accordance with laws governing armed conflict.
Bipartisan scrutiny has mounted over a report that Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, issued a verbal order in September to strike the vessel.
Democrats have said the allegations, first reported last week by the Washington Post, could amount to a war crime, and Republicans have also voiced their concerns about the legality of the attack on 2 September. The House and Senate armed services committees have opened investigations into the recent US military strikes on vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific Ocean.
In her comments to reporters on Monday, Leavitt did not dispute the Washington Post report that there were survivors after the initial strike. Her justification followed Donald Trump’s statement that he “wouldn’t have wanted that – not a second strike” when questioned about the incident the day before.
Leavitt stated, “Secretary Hegseth gave Adm [Frank M] Bradley permission to carry out these kinetic strikes.”. “Adm. Bradley led the engagement to guarantee the boat was destroyed and the threat to the United States of America was eliminated, working well within his authority and the law. ”.
Late on Monday, Hegseth posted: “Adm Mitch Bradley is an American hero, a true professional, and has my 100 percent support. I stand by him and the combat decisions he has made – on the September 2 mission and all others since. ”.
A month after the strike, Bradley was promoted from commander of Joint Special Operations Command to commander of US Special Operations Command.
Concern over the Trump administration’s military strikes against the alleged drug-smuggling boats has been building in Congress, but details of this follow-on strike stunned many lawmakers from both parties and generated stark questions about the legality of the attacks and the overall strategy in the region, particularly toward the Venezuelan president, Nicolás Maduro.
The lawmakers said they did not know whether last week’s Washington Post report was true, and some Republicans were sceptical. Still, they said the reported attacking of survivors of an initial missile strike posed serious concerns and merited further scrutiny.
After the president vigorously defended Hegseth on Sunday, the White House weighed in. “Pete said he did not order the death of those two men,” Trump said. “And I believe him,” he continued. ”.
According to Leavitt, Hegseth had discussed the reports over the weekend with members of Congress who might have voiced some reservations.
Gen Dan Caine, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff, also spoke over the weekend with the two Republican and two Democratic lawmakers leading the Senate and House armed services committees. He reiterated “his trust and confidence in the experienced commanders at every echelon”, Caine’s office said in a statement.
The statement added that the call focused on “addressing the intent and legality of missions to disrupt illicit trafficking networks which threaten the security and stability of the western hemisphere”.
John Thune, the majority leader of the Senate, broadly defended the operations on Monday, reiterating the Trump administration’s stance that they were required to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the United States.
Thune said the committees in Congress would look into what happened. “I don’t think you want to draw any conclusions or deductions until you have all the facts,” he said of the 2 September strike. “We’ll see where they lead. ”.
After the Post’s report, Hegseth said on Friday on X that “fake news is delivering more fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory reporting to discredit our incredible warriors fighting to protect the homeland”.
“Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both US and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict – and approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command,” Hegseth wrote.
The Senate Democratic leader, Chuck Schumer, called Hegseth a “national embarrassment” over his response to critics. Schumer demanded that Hegseth release the video of the strike and testify under oath about what happened.
The Republican senator for Mississippi, Roger Wicker, the chair of the Senate armed services committee, pledged that his panel’s investigation would be “done by the numbers”.
“We’ll find out the ground truth,” he said, adding that the ramifications of the report were “serious charges”.
