The court said its order would remain in place until the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled and the Supreme Court considered any appeal from that ruling.
“THE SUPREME COURT WON’T ALLOW US TO GET CRIMINALS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!” he said on social media.
If you have information to share about the Supreme Court or other federal courts, please contact us.
Friday’s order came after a high-stakes legal fight between the Trump administration and lawyers from the A.C.L.U.
subsequently asked the Supreme Court to act instead.
The Supreme Court ruled Friday that while the case is being heard in court, the Trump administration will not be permitted to deport a group of Venezuelan detainees who are alleged to be members of a violent gang under a rarely used wartime law.
The justices returned the case to a federal appeals court, instructing it to consider the migrants’ arguments that the centuries-old wartime law known as the Alien Enemies Act precluded their deportation. The justices said that the appeals court should also look into what kind of notice the government ought to give so that migrants can contest their deportations.
According to the court, its ruling will stand until the U. S. . The Supreme Court reviewed any appeals from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision.
Judge Samuel A. Jr. Alito. written a dissent, claiming that the justices lacked the jurisdiction to hear the case at this point. Justice Clarence Thomas joined him.
The decision is a serious setback to the Trump administration’s attempts to use the wartime law to swiftly and widely deport Venezuelan migrants who are suspected of belonging to the gang Tren de Aragua.
It also implies that most of the justices might question whether the administration provided adequate due process protections for the migrants prior to their deportation, possibly to an El Salvadorian terrorist prison.
The justices stated in their ruling that the stakes for the detainees are “particularly weighty,” referring to the March deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia of Maryland to the prison in El Salvador. Even though the justices ordered the Trump administration to “facilitate” his return, the administration has so far stated that it is unable to do so.
“Notice about 24 hours before removal, without information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, certainly does not pass muster,” the justices wrote. “”.
President Trump responded to the decision with rage. He posted on social media, saying, “The Supreme Court will not permit us to transport criminals out of our nation.”. He described it as “a bad and dangerous day for America” in a later post, writing, “The Supreme Court of the United States is not allowing me to do what I was elected to do.”. “.”.
Lawyers for the migrants were relieved.
Attorney Lee Gelernt of the American Civil Liberties Union said the ruling “means that more people will not be secretly sent to a brutal prison in El Salvador.”. “It raises issues of far-reaching importance that the administration is using the wartime law during peacetime, without due process,” he continued. “.”.
A dispute with a skeptic judiciary has resulted from the Trump administration’s attempt to use the law as a tool in its signature initiative to expedite the deportation of millions of migrants.
Have a tip about the courts? Please get in touch with us if you have information about the Supreme Court or other federal courts.
The deportation of groups of Venezuelans has been blocked by a number of lower court judges who have determined that the administration has overreached the law, which can only be used when the United States has been the target of “invasion” or “predatory incursion.”.
Several times in recent months, the justices of the Supreme Court have been asked to comment on the Trump administration’s deportation plans. They have already intervened to temporarily halt the deportation of a group of Venezuelans who were detained in northern Texas.
Following a high-stakes legal battle between the Trump administration and attorneys from the A, the order was issued Friday. A. L. . U. within one of those difficulties. On April 18, the attorneys hurried to the court after learning that Venezuelan migrants who were being held in Texas and suspected of belonging to the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua had been told they would be removed soon and were being loaded onto buses, most likely to be transported to the airport.
The team promptly brought a lawsuit on behalf of two Venezuelans detained at the detention facility in a federal trial court located in Abilene, Texas. In response, Justice Department attorneys informed a judge in a trial court that they did not currently have any plans to deport the detainees.
James W., the judge. Hendrix refused to issue a temporary order halting the deportations, despite having been appointed during the first Trump administration.
The a. A. L. U. later requested that the Supreme Court take action in its place.
Writing, “The government is directed not to remove any member of the putative class of detainees from the United States until further order of this court,” the justices temporarily halted the deportations after midnight on April 19.
That evening, the justices acted quickly, and the court has been considering the emergency application ever since.
In a court document, Solicitor General D. John Sauer had pleaded with the justices to give lower courts a chance to comment before making any further moves. He didn’t talk about the A’s particulars. A. L. . U. There were buses being loaded for the airport, indicating that the deportations had been imminent. Instead, he claimed that detainees who were about to be deported had received notice from the government and that they “had adequate time to file” claims contesting their removal.
The A. responded to the court. A. L. . U. denied this, claiming that the Trump administration had deviated from the court’s specific order requiring the government to give people time and notice to contest deportations.
The group’s brief claimed that rather than giving notice so that detainees could contest their removal, “the government gave detainees an English-only form, not provided to any attorney, which nowhere mentions the right to contest the designation or removal, much less explain how detainees could do so.”. “.”.
Mr. Dot Sauer coerced the justices once more earlier this week to approve the deportations. The administration claimed in a filing that “serious difficulties have arisen” as a result of the 176 migrants who were detained after the court’s emergency overnight ruling last month prevented their removal.
The Trump administration said that on April 26, 23 migrants tried to flood a housing unit by clogging the toilets, threatened to harm immigration officers and take hostages, and barricaded themselves inside the unit for several hours.
Mr. Dot Sauer wrote, “The government has a strong interest in promptly removing from the country” gang members “who pose a danger” to immigration officers, facility staff, and other detainees.
Public access to the Texas facility has been limited. Reuters obtained aerial photos of the men detained there on April 28. The letters SOS were formed in the detention center’s dirt yard by 31 men, some of whom were identified as high-risk by their red jumpsuits.
