Boeing fails a large portion of the FAA audit

None

-0.9994660019874573
The audit specifically looked at the production of Boeing’s 737 Max, following Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 from Portland, Oregon, to Ontario, California, in January, which was forced to make an emergency landing after a door plug suddenly blew out mid-air on a 737 Max 9 jet.
Boeing failed 33 of the audit’s 89 sections, CBS News confirmed, with regulators finding 97 examples of the company’s alleged non-compliance with many of its own best practices.
The probe so far indicates that the bolts holding that panel in place were not reinstalled during the plane’s manufacturing process.
LATAM Airlines Flight 800 was a different Boeing aircraft model than the one used during the Alaska flight — the 787, which is considerably larger than the 737 Max 9.
Compared with 174 passengers and six crew members on board the Alaska flight in January, the LATAM flight was carrying around 260 passengers and nine crew members when it abruptly dropped on its route to Auckland.
Around 50 passengers were hurt, and 13 were taken to hospitals for treatment after the plane landed.
LATAM said in a statement that the flight experienced technical issues that “caused a strong movement” of the aircraft.
“The best way to describe it is, it dropped out of the air instantly,” said Brian Jokat, a passenger on the LATAM flight.
The U.S. Department of Justice has also launched a criminal investigation into Boeing, stemming from the Alaska Airlines flight, CBS News has learned.
FAA Administrator Michael Whitaker said at a news briefing that the agency has “dramatically increased” oversight regarding “the actual production” of the Boeing 737 Max 9 jets and, for that reason, certifies the planes as safe now.

New information regarding a separate Boeing audit carried out by the Federal Aviation Administration shows that the company failed a significant portion of that evaluation, even as an investigation into what went wrong on the LATAM Airlines flight from Sydney, Australia, to Auckland, New Zealand, that left 50 passengers injured on Monday, gets underway.

The audit focused on Boeing’s 737 Max production after an emergency landing was required on Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 in January due to a door plug blowing out mid-air on a 737 Max 9. The flight originated in Portland, Oregon, and ended in Ontario, California. According to CBS News, Boeing failed 33 of the audit’s 89 sections. Regulators discovered 97 instances of the business allegedly failing to follow numerous of its own best practices.

The 737 Max 9 plane’s safety as well as Boeing’s production standards were called into question by the Alaska Airlines incident. This was especially true after the National Transportation and Safety Board’s preliminary investigation into the flight revealed that the aircraft was missing four crucial bolts that held the door plug in place. So far, the probe suggests that during the plane’s manufacturing process, the bolts holding that panel in place were not reinstalled.

After the door plug incident, both United Airlines and Alaska Airlines reported that they had discovered loose hardware on their 737 Max 9 aircraft. The FAA is currently investigating Flight 1282 to find out exactly what went wrong and whether Boeing “failed to ensure” that its aircrafts “were in a condition for safe operation in compliance with FAA regulations.”. “.”.

The Boeing 787, which is significantly larger than the 737 Max 9, was the aircraft model utilized on LATAM Airlines Flight 800, as opposed to the one used during the Alaska flight. When the LATAM plane suddenly disappeared from sight en route to Auckland, it had about 260 passengers and nine crew members on board, compared to the 174 passengers and six crew members on board the Alaska flight in January. Some passengers were left bloodied and others sent hurtling into the aircraft’s ceiling due to the sudden stop. After the plane landed, about fifty people were injured, and thirteen of them were sent to hospitals for treatment.

An aircraft “strong movement” was caused by technical problems that the airliner encountered, according to a statement from LATAM.

The airline issued a statement saying, “LATAM regrets any inconvenience and harm this situation may have caused its passengers, and reiterates its commitment to safety as a priority within the framework of its operational standards.”.

Although early reports indicate that the flight control system of the 787 plane may have momentarily malfunctioned, the Transport Accident Investigation Commission of New Zealand announced on Tuesday that it would seize the aircraft’s flight data recorder and cockpit voice recorder in an effort to learn more about what happened.

Brian Jokat, a traveler on the LATAM flight, put it best when he said, “It dropped out of the air instantly.”. After that, it began to nose down, sort of like a tail. “.

The American Airlines pilots’ union is now requesting that the FAA augment its oversight of airlines and maintenance facilities in light of the recent wave of aircraft incidents in the US and around the globe. The U.S. s. Regarding the Alaska Airlines flight, the Department of Justice has also opened a criminal investigation against Boeing, according to information obtained by CBS News.

Boeing stated that it is assisting with all current investigations and making quick adjustments to enhance its quality control and safety, but it declined to comment on the Justice Department’s investigation.

The New York Times published the audit’s initial report.

In a press briefing, FAA Administrator Michael Whitaker stated that the organization now certifies the Boeing 737 Max 9 aircraft as safe because it has “dramatically increased” oversight regarding “the actual production.”.

Leave a Reply

scroll to top