The risk of a disaster is what the Nasa contractor warns against

Reuters

The last launch, slated for 6 May, was scrubbed two hours before takeoff due to a valve issue.
The Starliner is designed to transport people to and from the International Space Station as well as other low-Earth-orbit destinations.
“As a valued Nasa partner and as valve experts, we strongly urge them not to attempt a second launch due to the risk of a disaster occurring on the launchpad,” ValveTech president Erin Faville said in a press release.
“According to media reports, a buzzing sound indicating the leaking valve was noticed by someone walking by the Starliner minutes before launch.
This sound could indicate that the valve has passed its lifecycle,” Ms Faville wrote.
This is the latest bout of bad news for Boeing, which has made repeated headlines recently over its aircraft defects.
A Boeing subcontractor, Aerojet Rocketdyne, was sued by a supplier, ValveTech, and a lengthy court battle ensued.
“Some media outlets have misquoted or misrepresented comments I made in a news release issued earlier this week,” Ms Faville said in the second release.

NEGATIVE

Before the much-awaited Starliner spacecraft’s first launch, which is scheduled to occur as early as next week, a NASA supplier urged the space agency to carry out additional safety inspections “before something catastrophic happens.”. “.

On May 17, ValveTech, a contractor providing NASA with valve parts for the rocket used to lift the Starliner aircraft, issued a warning about the impending launch.

A valve problem caused the last launch, scheduled for May 6, to be scrubbed two hours before takeoff.

People can be transported to and from the International Space Station and other low-Earth-orbit locations using the Starliner.

ValveTech president Erin Faville stated in a press release, “As a valued Nasa partner and as valve experts, we strongly urge them not to attempt a second launch due to the risk of a disaster occurring on the launchpad.”.

“Minutes before launch, a person strolling past the Starliner reportedly heard a buzzing sound that indicated the valve was leaking,” according to media reports. This noise might mean that the valve has reached the end of its useful life, according to Ms. Faville.

In addition, Ms. Faville urged NASA to “re-double safety checks and re-examine safety protocols to make sure the Starliner is safe before something catastrophic happens to the astronauts and to the people on the ground.”.

This is the most recent setback for Boeing, which has been in the news a lot lately due to flaws in its aircraft.

Subsequently, the contractor addressed an alternative matter, which was raised in a federal court ruling from November 2023. After a protracted legal dispute, a supplier named ValveTech sued a Boeing subcontractor named Aerojet Rocketdyne. In the end, it was determined that the subcontractor had broken a non-disclosure agreement even though they had not revealed any trade secrets.

According to an early press release, the Aerojet value was “not evaluated to ensure safety protocols and not qualified to the right specifications.”. “How could Boeing, Aerojet, and NASA have justified the mission’s worth without the background information?” Faville questioned.

ValveTech downplayed some of the calls in a subsequent statement, though.

“Ms. Faville stated in the second release that some media outlets have misquoted or misrepresented remarks I made in a news release issued earlier this week.”. “I expressed that before attempting to launch the Starliner once more, NASA should conduct additional safety inspections and reevaluate safety procedures to ensure the spacecraft is secure. “.

“It would be contrary to my company’s interests and senseless to terminate this mission as a valued NASA partner,” Faville continued. “I regret that some of my remarks were misconstrued to suggest otherwise. “.

On May 13, 2024, this article underwent revisions. The fact that the rocket used to launch the aircraft—rather than the Starliner spacecraft itself—is the source of the value issue was not made clear in an earlier version of this story. To further elucidate Ms. Faville’s request, more quotes and information regarding an earlier lawsuit were included.

scroll to top