Should you pay for breast cancer?

Precise News

The hospitals and companies that provide these tools tout their ability to speed the work of radiologists and detect cancer earlier than standard mammograms alone.
Currently, mammograms identify around 87 percent of breast cancers.
They’re more likely to miss cancer in younger women and those with dense breasts.
“It’s not a perfect science by any stretch,” said Dr. John Lewin, chief of breast imaging at Smilow Cancer Hospital and Yale Cancer Center.
Experts are excited by the prospect of improving the accuracy of screening for breast cancer, which 300,000 women are diagnosed with each year in the United States.
tools will work well across a diverse range of patients and whether they can meaningfully improve breast cancer survival.
Certain patterns, such as bright white spots with jagged edges, may be a sign of cancer.
models can, in some cases, “see what we cannot see,” said Dr. Katerina Dodelzon, a radiologist who specializes in breast imaging at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center.

NEUTRAL

Patients are beginning to receive a new service from clinics across the nation: having their mammograms read by an artificial intelligence model in addition to radiologists. These tools’ providers, hospitals and companies, claim that they can detect cancer earlier than standard mammograms and expedite radiologists’ work.

Approximately 87% of breast cancer cases are currently detected by mammography. Individuals who are younger and have dense breasts are at a higher risk of missing cancer. They can also reveal precancerous conditions that might never cause major issues but nevertheless require treatment because it is impossible to predict the risk of not treating them. Occasionally, they result in false positives, necessitating additional testing to rule out cancer.

Dr. John Lewin, chief of breast imaging at Smilow Cancer Hospital and Yale Cancer Center, stated, “It’s not a perfect science by any stretch.”.

With 300,000 women receiving a diagnosis of breast cancer annually in the US, experts are thrilled about the potential to increase the accuracy of screening. However, they are also unsure about whether these As. Me. Will these tools be effective for a wide variety of patients and can they significantly increase the survival rate of breast cancer patients?

In what way does A. Me. Does analysis work?

Mammograms provide a plethora of information about the breast ducts and tissues. Cancer may be indicated by specific patterns, such as sharply edged, brilliant white spots. In contrast, fine white lines could be signs of benign calcifications or suggest additional testing. For humans, distinguishing certain patterns from typical breast tissue can be challenging.

An. 1. Models have the ability to “see what we cannot see,” according to Dr. Katerina Dodelzon, a radiology specialist at NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center who specializes in breast imaging.

We appreciate your patience as we confirm your access.

Sign in if you’re already a subscriber.

Want access to all of The Times? Sign up.

scroll to top