Meghan Markle’s alleged ‘Mean Girls’ staff treatment probed in report

The Mercury News

Really, like, ‘Mean Girls’ teenager.” Before working with Meghan, the person had a hard time believing the stories about Meghan bullying palace aides or yelling at them after she married Harry in 2018.
She’s doing great.” The Vanity Fair report comes at a crucial time for Harry and Meghan’s efforts to make a success of themselves as media moguls, entrepreneurs and global do-gooders.
Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan initially received glowing headlines for dropping into Pasadena last Friday to serve meals, leave donations and give hugs to Eaton fire survivors.
“For Meghan and Harry to show up from Montecito, and they get a tour?
“And then whatever happened to them, well…they shouldn’t have gotten between Meghan and her good work,” Peele concluded.

NEGATIVE

Following their accusations of being “disaster tourists” for touring the burning remains of homes destroyed in the Eaton fire, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are under increased scrutiny for the reputational, professional, and personal difficulties they have faced in the five years since leaving the royal life and relocating to California.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex, who reside in Montecito, are unfortunate because a recent Vanity Fair cover story titled “American Hustle” seems to support earlier claims that Meghan is a “difficult,” “terrible,” and even “bullying” boss to her staff. The magazine interviewed dozens of people for the 8,000-word article, but some of them were only allowed to be interviewed anonymously due to non-disclosure agreements they had to sign.

According to Vanity Fair, Meghan appears keen to be “a good person” and to participate in “world-improving (if also brand-building) activities.” Harry, on the other hand, can be “charming” if he gives the impression that he “has no inner life” outside of polo. Nevertheless, the former television star has turned into a divisive figure in America. She also frequently attacks “people so below her in status” in what author Anna Peele called retaliatory behavior. “”.

Vanity Fair spoke with someone who found it difficult to work on Meghan and Harry’s problematic Netflix and Spotify media projects, and she revealed that her interactions with staff members tended to follow a recurring pattern. At first, she would “be warm and effusive, engendering an atmosphere of professional camaraderie.”. “.”.

She “would become cold and withholding toward the person she perceived to be responsible” when something didn’t work out, which was frequently because of Meghan and Harry’s own demands, the source told Vanity Fair. For example, a teaser for her Spotify podcast was released months before she had even taped any episodes.

“Really, really, really awful,” the source said. incredibly painful. Because she’s always playing checkers, and I won’t even mention chess, she’s clearly aware of everyone’s position on her board. Additionally, you will be thrown to the wolves at any time if you are not in. “.”.

1/1Skip Ad Go to the advertiser’s website and go to the page.

The source also told Vanity Fair that Meghan’s treatment of her subordinates might be “undermining.”. “Your sense of self is being eaten away at.”. Adolescents who are truly “Mean Girls.”. “”.

Prior to working with Meghan, the person found it difficult to believe the rumors that she had yelled at or bullied palace aides following her 2018 marriage to Harry. A year after Meghan and Harry left the country, the Times UK published the first reports in 2021, denouncing the royal family and the tabloid media for their racist and cruel treatment. However, this individual discovered that such behavior occurred “on any given Tuesday” after working with Meghan. “”.

One individual took a leave of absence after working with Meghan on three episodes of her Spotify podcast, “Archetypes,” according to Vanity Fair, while “several others” claimed to have taken long breaks, quit their jobs, or received ongoing therapy as a result of their interactions with the former TV star.

Before half-jokingly adding, “But who am I to criticize Meghan Markle? She’s doing great,” one person told Vanity Fair, “I think her perception might be better if Meghan acknowledged her own shortcomings or personal contributions to situations rather than staying trapped in a victim narrative.”. “.”.

The Vanity Fair article is released at a critical juncture in Harry and Meghan’s endeavors to establish themselves as successful media moguls, business owners, and international humanitarians.

Following the start of the deadly wildfires in Los Angeles in January, Meghan’s plans to debut her new Netflix series, “With Love, Meghan,” as a lifestyle guru this past week were shelved. 8. Meghan declared that the show would be moved to March 4 in order to “focus on the needs of those impacted by the wildfires in my home state of California.”. “”.

According to her detractors, after so many people in Altadena and Pacific Palisades had lost everything, she and Netflix were forced to postpone a show that would show the duchess enjoying her opulent Southern California lifestyle with her famous friends.

While this was going on, Harry and Meghan made headlines last Friday when they visited Pasadena to feed, donate, and embrace Eaton fire survivors. Actor Justine Bateman and others were incensed that they were photographed, but they quickly started to receive harsh online criticism after Pasadena’s mayor gave them a personal tour of burned-out neighborhoods.

They are “ambulance chasers” and “disaster tourists,” according to Bateman. On their show earlier this week, TMZ founder Harvey Levin and his producers also criticized the couple. Levin stated, “I think it’s crazy that most people can’t get into these areas, especially Altadena, and they don’t even know if their homes are still there.”. When Meghan and Harry arrive from Montecito, why do they receive a tour?

The visit isn’t “sitting well with people in the community,” according to senior news producer Charlie Neff, while executive producer Charles Latibeaudiere concurred that it appeared to be “an ill use of resources.”. It seems unnecessary and unauthentic to be going there and doing that. “”.

It is unclear if the criticism of “disaster tourists” will endure. However, since Harry is portrayed in the Vanity Fair story as a naive, lonely person who hasn’t made many friends in America and is desperate to get back in touch with his family, it calls into question their marriage. According to one account, he may not have realized the harm his candid memoir, “Spare,” would cause to his family ties. According to some, he was raised in such an odd and privileged way that he doesn’t “know what life really is” or comprehend the concept of needing to make a living.

Additionally, the story may bring up Meghan’s alleged bullying incident again. The 2021 Times UK report was first dismissed by her representatives as part of a “calculated smear campaign” orchestrated by the British press and royal establishment, which had become antagonistic toward her. Buckingham Palace’s announcement in 2022 that it would not make public the results of an internal investigation into Meghan’s alleged bullying appeared to put an end to the bullying claims.

However, in a damning report published in September, The Hollywood Reporter brought up the subject again. According to one source, Meghan “belittles people,” disregards advice, and is a “dictator in high heels” who yells and gives orders. According to another source, she and Harry are both “poor decision-makers,” which explains why, after two years and a rumored $20 million contract, the two were only able to produce one 12-episode podcast. Employees referred to her as “a demon” who experienced “psycho moments” in a subsequent report published by The Daily Beast. “”.

Vanity Fair interviewed those who had a positive experience working with Meghan, such as producer Jane Marie, who attempted to assist them in creating podcasts for their Archewell productions, for its report. Michelle described Meghan as “just a lovely, genuine person,” according to Marie.

In an attempt to counterbalance the criticism of Meghan, Vanity Fair writer Peele provided a sympathetic explanation for why she might struggle to manage staff or harbor resentment toward those who criticize or despise her. Peele pointed out that it stems from her admission that she was an outsider in high school.

Peele questioned, “Is it any surprise that a person who had been subjected to such appalling treatment by the press and her husband’s family could still feel victimized and righteous?”.

Beyond “the loathsome” media or “her pitiful father and half sister,” who sold stories about her to the tabloids, Meghan might also see some people as enemies or intruders, according to Peele. Professionals who work for Meghan, such as palace aides or those who “actually knew how to make a podcast,” could also be seen as her enemies, Peele suggested. “Despite her immense fame, wealth, and privilege,” Peele wrote, she might start to perceive them as more powerful than herself.

Peele came to the conclusion, “And then whatever happened to them, well…they shouldn’t have gotten between Meghan and her good work.”.

scroll to top