Similar automated driving systems are rated poor by the safety group

None

-0.99967360496521
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety rolled out a new safety rating system for partial automated driving systems, and the first tests did not go well for Tesla – or nearly any of the electric vehicle giant’s rivals.
Under the system, the IIHS assigns the systems a rating of good, acceptable, marginal or poor based on its safeguards, and none of the automated systems landed an overall rating of “good.”
POWER RESTORED AT TESLA GIGAFACTORY AFTER FAR-LEFT ACTIVIST SABOTAGEThe only system that performed worse than Tesla’s, according to the findings, was Volvo’s Pilot Assist.
But the three remaining systems did not receive glowing reviews from the IIHS, either.
The IIHS reported that it expects manufacturers will continue to improve their systems’ safety features, and noted that the two Tesla systems it tested used software that preceded the company’s latest software update from December.
Mercedes-Benz noted in its statement that “This new IIHS testing methodology does not assess the performance of the driver assistance systems, instead it focuses on safeguards to prevent misuse.
We take the findings of the IIHS partial driving automation safeguard ratings very seriously.”
They added, “We’re happy to see that IIHS is proposing countermeasures and test protocols seeking to reduce the prevalence of both overreliance on and misuse of any driving assistance systems.”
The BMW statement added, “The test conducted by the IIHS in the BMW X1 evaluated only one function of one driver assistance system.”
Lexus parent Toyota also issued a statement, saying, “Beyond meeting applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards, Toyota continuously aim to increase vehicle safety.

The first tests of the new safety rating system for partially automated driving systems by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety did not go well for Tesla or almost any of its competitors.

Based on its safeguards, the IIHS rates the systems as good, acceptable, marginal, or poor; none of the automated systems received an overall rating of “good.”. “.

11 out of the 14 systems received a “poor” rating. These included the Full Self-Driving version of Tesla’s Autopilot, which is currently in beta testing; Nissan’s ProPILOT Assist 2.0; Mercedes-Benz’s Active Distance Assist DISTRONIC with Active Steering Assist; Ford’s BlueCruise; and BMW’s Active Driving Assistant.

After being severely disrupted, power was restored to the Tesla factory.

It was discovered that Volvo’s Pilot Assist was the only system that underperformed Tesla’s.

Ticker Security Last Change Percentage TSLA TESLA INC. 177.54, -0,23, and -0,13 percent.

Tesla, Inc.

However, the IIHS did not give the three remaining systems very positive reviews either.

TESLA’S ELECTRIC SEMI-TRUCK GOES UP AGAINST DIESEL BIG RIG.

With an overall rating of “acceptable,” Lexus’ Teammate with Advanced Drive was rated as the best system. The No. Both Nissan’s ProPILOT Assist with Navi-link and General Motors’ Super Cruise secured “marginal” ratings from the IIHS, placing them in third and second place, respectively.

The last change percentage for Ticker Security was GM General Motors Co. 39 points22, -0 points30, -0 points76 percent F Ford Motor Company. 12 points = 0 points = 0 percent.

IIHS President David Harkey stated, “Some drivers may feel that partial automation makes long drives easier, but there is little evidence it makes driving safer.”. “When systems lack the necessary safeguards, as numerous well-publicized crashes have demonstrated, it can introduce new risks.”. “.”.

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla, has stated that a Tesla running on Autopilot is roughly ten times safer than the U.S. S. less dangerous than a Tesla with the technology turned off than average and five times safer. Approximately one thousand incidents involving Tesla’s Autopilot are being looked into by federal authorities.

The IIHS reported that it expects manufacturers will continue to improve their systems’ safety features, and noted that the two Tesla systems it tested used software that preceded the company’s latest software update from December.

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO.

In response to FOX Business’s requests for comments on the IIHS report, every automaker emphasized their dedication to safety.

In its statement, Nissan also stated that it “will continue to work with IIHS in all matters related to customer safety, including evaluating the results from the first-ever Partial Automation Safeguards test.”. “.”.

After BlueCruise was unveiled in 2021, Ford stated, “We have been working closely with IIHS.”. We will consider the feedback provided by IIHS when we continue to assess upcoming updates, even though we disagree with their findings. ****.

“This new IIHS testing methodology focuses on safeguards to prevent misuse, rather than assessing the performance of the driver assistance systems,” Mercedes-Benz stated in a statement. We carefully consider the results of the partial driving automation safeguard ratings provided by the IIHS. “.

A Volvo representative stated in a statement that “At Volvo Cars, we think a car is either autonomous or not, and we don’t currently sell any vehicles that have features that we would classify as autonomous driving capabilities. “We’re glad to see that IIHS is putting forth countermeasures and test protocols in an effort to lower the frequency of driving assistance system abuse as well as overreliance. “.

BMW stated: “In this case, we disagree philosophically about how and when to implement driver assistance systems’ monitoring of driver attention. However, we respect and value the IIHS’s efforts to push our industry to build better, safer cars. ****.

“The test conducted by the IIHS in the BMW X1 evaluated only one function of one driver assistance system,” the BMW statement continued. “.

Toyota, the company that owns Lexus, also released a statement in which it stated, “Toyota continuously aims to increase vehicle safety, beyond meeting applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards. Toyota takes into account performance in third-party testing programs such as the IIHS Top Safety Pick program and the NHTSA’s New Car Assessment Program as part of that endeavor. ****.

“As new cars are outfitted with more sophisticated driver assistance systems (ADAS), initiatives such as the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) partial automation ratings report are critical for more comprehensive and coordinated safety measures,” stated General Motors. With the intention of improving the driving experience, we are cautious when it comes to safely extending the use of Super Cruise, the first hands-free system in the industry. Not a safety feature, Super Cruise is an ADAS. “.

FOX Business requested a comment from Tesla regarding the findings, but Tesla did not provide one.

Reuters helped to write this article.

Leave a Reply

scroll to top